Narayan Das v. Arati Das And ORS
16.07.
IN THE HIGH C0URT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION.
Ct. No. 06 CO 2521 of 2025 Ab Narayan Das Vs.
Arati Das and others.
--------------- Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury, Ms. Sulagna Sarkar.
... for the petitioner.
1. As prayed by the learned Advocate-on-Record of the petitioner, leave is granted to the learned Advocateon-Record of the petitioner to amend the cause title of the revisional application here and now.
2. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Baruipur, to dispose of the Title Suit No. 134 of 2015 expeditiously.
3. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite parties. However, the learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with this order, upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocate representing the opposite parties before the learned trial judge.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that an application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the plaintiff/petitioner is pending from the year 2021. She further submits that 24th November 2025 has been fixed for hearing
of such application. She also submits that the application for amendment is otherwise ready for hearing.
5. In the light of the submissions made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner, CO 2521 of 2025 stands disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Baruipur, to take up the hearing of the application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure on the next date fixed i.e. on 24th November 2025 and shall make an endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. After disposal of the interlocutory application, learned trial judge shall make endeavour to dispose of the suit without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties keeping in mind that the suit is pending since 2015.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)