Amar Mondal v. Dr P Ulaganathan

899.

7.04.2022 S.D.

CPAN 766 of 2021 in W.P.A. 398 of 2020 Amar Mondal Vs.

Dr. P. Ulaganathan Mr. Sarthak Burman ....For the petitioner.

Sk. Md. Galib Ms. Subhra Nag ... For the Contemnor.

Learned advocates appearing on behalf of both the parties submit, upon instruction that, the order passed by the Court has duly been complied with by the alleged contemnor. In view of such submission, there is no requirement to proceed with the contempt application any further. CPAN 766 of 2021 stands disposed of.

The report filed by the learned advocate representing the alleged contemnor in Court today is taken on record. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon completion of usual legal formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)