Abdullah Al Mamun @ Abdulla Al Mamun And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

26.07.2022 Serial no.26 Aloke CRM (A) 3544 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Gazole Police Station Case No. 359 of 2022 dated 17.05.2022 under Sections 498A/323/325/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Abdullah Al Mamun @ Abdulla Al Mamun & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. Md. Sarwar Jahan, Advocate Mr. Maidul Islam Kayal, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee, ld. APP Mr. Santanu Chatterjee, Advocate ... ...For the State Mr. Subrata Roy, Advocate Mr. Amarendera Chakraboarty, Advocate ... ... For the de facto complainant Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the de facto complainant tried to commit suicide. The petitioners were falsely implicated.

State and the de facto complainant are represented. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the materials in the case diary including the injury report of the de facto complainant.

Learned Advocate appearing for the de facto complainant relies upon photographs establishing the nature and extent of the torture that the petitioner meted out to the de facto complainant.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. CRM (A) 3544 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)