← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/2125/2015disposed as infructuous

Hdfc Bank Ltd. & ORS. v. State Of West Bengal And ANR.

2025-08-18Hon'Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)2 pages

18.08.2025 Item No.78 Ct. No. 446 KS C.R.R. 2125 of 2015 With I.A. No. CRAN 1 of 2015 (Old No. CRAN 2969 of 2015) + I.A. No. CRAN 4 of 2016 (Old No. CRAN 4363 of 2016) + I.A. No. CRAN 13 of 2025 In the matter of: HDFC Bank Ltd. & Ors.

...... Petitioners Mr. Kallol Basu Mr. Kaushik Chatterjee Mr. Tirthankar Dey ....For the Petitioners Mr. Saryati Datta .....For the State

1. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed for quashing of the proceeding being, A.C.G.R. No.2692 of 2015 pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24 Parganas arising out Survey Park Police Station Case No.173 of 2015 dated 9.5.2015 under Sections 420/ 406/ 467/ 468/ 469/ 471/ 472/ 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

2. During pendenncy of this proceeding pending before this Court since 2017, the investigation has been completed and final report has been submitted by the investigating authority.

3. Learned Prosecution today has filed the report before this Court of the Officer-in-Charge, Shakespeare Sarani Police Station, which reveals that the final report, which was submitted on July 28, 2022 issued a notice upon the de facto complainant, Dr. Sabyasachi Dutt and the next date of hearing has been fixed on 25th September, 2025. Let the report be kept with the record.

4. The report reveals that the learned C.J.M. has already taken note of final report and has issued notice upon the de facto complainant.

5. It is submitted by the learned State respondent that copy of such report has already been handed over to the learned advocate for the petitioner.

6. In view of such development, this revisional application pending before this Court has loses its force and it becomes infructuous.

7. Accordingly, the revisional application being, C.R.R. 2125 of 2015 stands disposed of as infructuous.

8. No further direction is required to be passed, in this regard.

9. However, the petitioner is at liberty to intimate the de facto complaint, if he so desires.

10. Let a copy of this order be sent to the office of the learned Court of C.J.M. for further intimation and taking necessary action.

11. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)