← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/1107/2025rejected

Tapas Rajwar v. State Of West Bengal

2025-08-25Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

August 25, 2025 39 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (M) 1107 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Katwa Police Station Case No. 328 of 2022 dated 13/6/2022 under Sections 341/326/307/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.. And In Re :

Tapas Rajwar ... Petitioner.

Adv. Soumik Ganguly, Adv. Diptendu Banerjee, Adv. Pinky Sarkar, ... for the petitioner.

Adv. Zareen N. Khan, Adv. Debjani Sahu, ...for the State.

The petitioner is in custody for more than three years and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only four out of sixteen witnesses have been examined. There is remote chance of conclusion of trial in near future.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record.

Specific overt act has been attributed to the petitioner by the eye witnesses as well as the injured. One of the offending weapons has been recovered pursuant to the leading statement of the petitioner. Four witnesses have been examined. Considering the nature and gravity of the offence and prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The application for bail is disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)