Subhendu Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

25.08.2025 jb.

jdt.

C.R.M. (M) 1115 of 2025 In Re : An Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure/under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Bishnupur Police Station Case No. 366 of 2021 dated 19.06.2021 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Subhendu Mondal Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay Mr. Santanu Maji Ms. Bidisha Chakraborty Sadia Parveen ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Suman De Mr. D. Das ... For the State The petitioner is in custody for more than 4 years and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case is based on circumstantial evidence and there is no eye witness to the same.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record. The husband of the victim has implicated the petitioner in his statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner was arrested from the place of occurrence along with the offending weapon soon after the alleged incident. Three more witnesses are left to be examined. Trial is on the verge of completion.

Considering the material on record, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Case diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)