Calcutta High CourtCPAN/1453/2004dismissed for default

Dilip Kr. Roy v. Abdul Kalam

2022-08-08Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

08.08.2022.

C.P.A.N. 1453 of 2004 In WPA 15700 of 2002 Dilip Kr. Roy Vs.

Abdul Kalam ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)