← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3614/2022dismissed

Kanan Mal And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-07-29Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De1 pages

29.07.2022 Serial no.30 Aloke CRM (A) 3614 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Arambagh Police Station Case No. 177 of 2022 dated 18.06.2022 under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and adding Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Smt. Kanan Mal & Anr. ... ... Petitioners Mr. Ansuman Bera, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. D. Chatterjee, ld. APP Ms. Debjani Dasgupta, Advocate ... ...For the State Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh, Advocate Ms. Sompurna Chatterjee, Advocate ... ... For the de facto complainant Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners reside on a different place. They were not present at the place of occurrence. Three other co-accused are in custody.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the materials in the case diary. He submits that the victim suffered 90% burn injuries. He refers to the statement of the neighbours implicating the petitioners.

The de facto complainant is represented.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. CRM (A) 3614 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)