Sandip Kumar Mehena v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.
02.11.2021 Item No.18 Court No.06 Vacation Bench DC & AM WPA No. 17474 of 2021 (Via Video Conferencing) In re: An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India;
And In re: Sandip Kumar Mehena -vs- State of West Bengal & ors.
Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das, Mr. Sagnik Mukherjee ... For the petitioner Mr. Amal Kumar Sen, Mr. Subrata Dasgupta, Mr. Bipin Ghosh ...For the State respondents Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
In this matter, the petitioner has challenged the impugned notice of sale on auction of the property in question belonged to the petitioner for realisation of the bank loan borrowed from it by the petitioner. Date of such auction has been fixed on 17th November, 2021 and petitioner submits that he received notice on or after 8th October, 2021. According to the petitioner, demand of the respondent bank on date is Rs. 3,50,000/- and he is willing to pay the amount of Rs. 1,50,000/- in course of tomorrow positively and for the balance amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- he seeks
liberty to make a compromise petition before the respondent bank authority.
Considering the submission of the parties, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to deposit Rs.
1,50,000/- with the respondent bank in course of tomorrow positively and also file a compromise petition. If such compromise petition is filed by the petitioner, the respondent bank shall dispose of the same by 15th November, 2021 by passing a reasoned and speaking order and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or his authorised representatives. The respondent bank authorities shall consider and dispose of the same by imposing appropriate reasonable conditions of further payment in exercise of their jurisdiction.
If the condition of payment of Rs.
1,50,000/- is already complied with and the respondent considers the compromise petition by disposing of the same by imposing reasonable condition, then question of auction will not arise.
With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition being WPA 17474 of 2021 is disposed of.
Since the writ petition is disposed of at the motion stage without calling for affidavits, the allegations contained in this writ petition should be deemed to have been denied.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)