Asha Bansal And ORS v. Raj Kumar Sultania Huf

22.08.2023 Sl. No.47(DL) srm C.O. No. 2298 of 2023 Asha Bansal & Ors.

Versus

Raj Kumar Sultania (HUF) Mr. Meghnad Dutta, Ms. Shreya Choudhury ...for the Petitioners.

The petitioners are the plaintiffs in Ejectment Suit No.67 of 2022, which is pending before the learned Judge, 12th Bench, City Civil Court at Calcutta.

The petitioners submit that three applications are pending.

The petitioners pray for expeditious disposal of the applications as also the suit.

An order of expeditious disposal of any litigation enures to the benefit of all the parties and hence prior service of this revisional application upon the opposite party is not required. The prayer is innocuous.

Under such circumstances, the revisional application is disposed of with a direction upon the learned court below to dispose of the applications within a period of four months from the next date fixed, according to the seriality as the court

thinks fit, independently and strictly in accordance with law. The contesting parties shall be given opportunity to file their written objections, if not already filed. Thereafter, the court shall proceed with the hearing of the suit and dispose of the same within a period of one year from the date of disposal of the interlocutory applications. Unnecessary adjournments shall not be granted to any of the parties.

This Court has neither gone into the merits of the suit nor into the merits of applications.

A copy of the revisional application, along with a server copy of this order, be served upon the opposite party within a week.

The revisional application is, thus, disposed of. There will be, however, no order as to costs. Parties are to act on the basis of the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)