← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(R)/93/2025allowed

Xyz v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-07-25Hon'Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak2 pages

25.07.2025 Item no.8 Court No.42 ss HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA (Allowed) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (R) 93 of 2025 In re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, in connection with Barrackpore Police Station Case No.60 of dated 23.06.2025 under Sections 329(4)/324(4)/115(2)/74/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 presently pending before the learned Judge, Special Court, under POCSO Act Barrackpore, North 24-Parganas.

-AndIn the matter of : XYZ ... Petitioner Mr. Debasis Kar Mr. Arka Tilak Bhadra ...for the petitioner Mr. Md. Adil Badr Mr. Aninda Sundar Chatterjee ... ...For the State Mr. Husen Mustafi ... for the de facto complainant Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that there is no such allegation of sexual assault. The case has arisen out of misunderstanding and family dispute. The petitioner is the maternal uncle of the victim and he is in custody for 14 days. He seeks for enlargement of the petitioner on bail. Learned Advocate for the State, opposing such prayer for bail, submits that the victim was forced out of the bathroom while she was not wearing her pant. He seeks for dismissal of the bail application.

Learned Advocate for the de facto complainant leaves the matter to the discretion of this Court.

Perused the case diary and the materials on record.

The victim in her statement states that she was forcibly taken out of the bathroom by the grandmother of the victim. The petitioner is the maternal uncle of the victim. Though there are allegations of assault, but there are no such allegations of sexual assault. Considering the above, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be a local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under POCSO Act Barrackpore, North 24-Parganas. The petitioner shall appear before the trial court on each and every day of substantive hearing subject to the provisions of Section 317 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Section 355 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. The petitioner shall meet the Inspector-inCharge of Barrackpore Police Station once in a fortnight, until further orders.

In the event the petitioner fails to comply with any of the conditions as stated above, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

It is made clear that the observation made hereinabove is only for the sake of disposal of this application. Accordingly, the application for bail being CRM (R) 93 of 2025 is disposed of.

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)