Tripti Banerjee @ Bandopadhyay v. Dipankar Sikdar And ORS
22.12.2021 Ct. 21 D/L 75 ab C.O. 1896 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) Tripti Banerjee @ Bandopadhyay -VsDipankar Sardar & Ors.
Mr. Ashim Kumar Routh, ... for the petitioner Mr. Ashim Kumar Routh, learned advocate for the petitioner is present.
Record shows that the notice of this application has not been served on the opposite parties.
The petitioner by filing the present application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for expeditious disposal of the Ejectment Suit being T.S. No. 592 of 2018, pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, Barasat, North 24 Parganas .
The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the learned Court below has been granting unnecessary adjournments and due to which, there is a delay in disposal of the case and such delay is causing hardship to the petitioner.
Having regard to the nature of relief claimed by the petitioner, being a prayer for expeditious disposal of the ejectment suit, I do not find any need to serve notice of the present application on the opposite parties and it is not likely to cause any prejudice to the interest of the opposite parties. Therefore, service of notice upon the opposite parties is dispensed with.
The learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, Barasat, North 24 Parganas, is requested to dispose of the Ejectment Suit being T.S. No. 592 of 2018, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of one year from the date of communication of this order, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties except only on reasonable ground.
Accordingly, the revisional application being C.O. 1896 of 2021 is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all formalities.
( Kesang Doma Bhutia, J.)