Biswanath Dey @ Danny v. State Of West Bengal

28.08.2025 Ct.No.34 b.das Rejected C.R.M. (M) 1143 of 2025 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 filed in connection with Krishnagar Kotwali Police Station Case No.576 of 2022 dated 07.06.2022 under Section 302 of the IPC.

And In Re : Biswanath Dey @ Danny ... Petitioner.

Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. T. Ahmed Mr. D. Banerjee Mr. Ezaz Ahmed ... for the petitioner.

Ms. Faria Hossain Ms. Sana Naaz ... for the State.

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

The petitioner is in custody for more than 3 years and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that despite direction given by this Court on 20th June, 2024 to the learned trial Court to conclude trial within four months from the next date fixed for recording of evidence, trial is yet to be concluded.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that 22 out of 28 witnesses have been examined and dates have been fixed for examination of the remaining witnesses.

I have considered the material on record. The petitioner appears to be the husband of the victim who was murdered. Her throat was slit. The petitioner who was residing with the victim together owes an explanation under

Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act with regard to the circumstances under which the incident occurred. Considering the gravity of the offence and prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

The application for bail is thus disposed of. Case diary be returned.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)