Dilip Kumar Ban And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

02.08.2022 Serial no.42 Aloke CRM (A) 3685 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Beliabera Police Station Case No. 65 of 2020 dated 20.07.2020 under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 9B of the I.E. Act.

-AndIn the matter of : Dilip Kumar Ban & Anr. ... ... Petitioners Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Advocate Mr. Bhaskar Hutait, Advocate Mr. Mujibar Ali Naskar, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Anindya Sundar Chatterjee, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Considering the fact that no recovery was made from the possession of the petitioners and considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. CRM (A) 3685 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)