Dhruba Sharma And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

24.11.2021 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M. 7413 of 2021 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Karandighi Police Station Case No. 587 of 2020 dated 22.11.2020 under Sections 448/341/323/326/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Dhruba Sharma & Anr.

...... petitioners Mr. Khalid Hasan ....for the petitioners Ms. S. Das ....for the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, the petitioners were falsely implicated. Out of three persons named in the First Information Report (FIR), one was arrested and enlarged on bail by the Jurisdictional Court. He contends that the police submitted charge-sheet and, therefore, custodial interrogations of the petitioners are not required. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents of the case diary including the injury report.

Considering the nature of the offences and considering the fact that the police submitted charge-sheet and considering the fact that one of the co-accused was granted anticipatory bail

by the Jurisdictional Court, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional court on every date fixed and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)