← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/1193/2025rejected

Imam Sk v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-11-13Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

13.11.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.8 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.

Rejected C.R.M. (M) 1193 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Berhampore Police Station Case No. 620 of dated 29.06.2020 under Sections 376/370/372/373/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4/5/7 of I.T.P.A., 1956 and Sections 4/8/12/17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. And In Re : Imam Sk ... Petitioner.

Mr. Arnab Chatterjee, Mr. Anisur Rahaman ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Md. Adil Badr, Mr. Sobhan Gani ... For the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has prayed for bail on the grounds that the petitioner is in custody for 2 years 11 months.

I have considered the nature of the offence and the stage of the case. It has been submitted on behalf of the State that only the evidence of two of the investigating officers is left. Having considered the same, I direct the Superintendent of Police, Murshidabad Police District to engage a Nodal Officer in the rank of Additional S.P. to ensure that the two witnesses who are left are compelled to appear before the court as and when the dates/schedule are fixed by the learned Trial Court.

The learned Trial Court would within a period of three months from the next date so fixed, complete whole of the prosecution evidence.

At this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

Report submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the State be kept with the record.

The application for bail, being CRM (M) 1193 of 2025, is, thus, disposed of.

All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)