← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/3261/2025dismissed as infructuous

Soumallya Mukherjee v. Shruti Mukherjee (Paul)

2026-04-01Hon'Ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma1 pages

01.04.2026 Sl. no. 29 Ct. No. 42 P.M.

CRR 3261 OF 2025 Soumallya Mukherjee - Vs - Shruti Mukherjee (Paul) Mr. Mouyukh Mukherjee, Mr. Arunava Ganguly, Ms. Sagnika Banerjee, Mr. Koustav Bhattacharya ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta, Mr. B. N. Joshi, Mr. Suman majumder, Ms. Sofia Nesar, Ms. P. Garain.

Ms. S. Kundu ... for the opposite party 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction states that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter as it becomes infructuous.

2.

In view of the submission of the petitioner this petition becomes dismissed as infructuous.

3.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all usual requisite formalities..

(Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)