Calcutta High CourtCPAN/1785/2000dismissed for default

Julfukar Sk v. Md.Taijanddin Sk

2022-08-29Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar1 pages

29.08.2022.

C.P.A.N. 1785 of 2000 in WPA 16935 of 1985 Julfukar Sk. Vs. Md. Taijanddin Sk.

ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)