Sanjib Biswas v. State Of West Bengal

08.08.2022 Serial no.6 Aloke CRM (A) 3751 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Ranaghat Police Station Case No. 528 of 2022 dated 22.07.2022 under Sections 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Sanjib Biswas ... ... Petitioner Mr. Kallol Mondal, Advocate Mr. Amanul Islam, Advocate Mr. Krishan Roy, Advocate Mr. Sourav Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. Soivik Das, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Advocate Ms. Sonali Das, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that immediately on receipt of the first information report, the sum of Rs.22,15,440/- was refunded by the petitioner to the Government.

Investigations are still ongoing in order to unearth the amount of money involved.

Serious allegations of defalcation of public funds are involved. The petitioner stands implicated in the incident. We also take note of the official position held by the petitioner. In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 3751 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)