Ansarul Rahaman @ Anchharul Rahaman v. State Of West Bengal

05.08.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3752 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kaliyaganj Police Station Case No. 321 of 2022 dated 05.07.2022 under Sections 448/323/354A/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Ansarul Rahaman @ Anchharul Rahaman ...... petitioner Mr. Kaustav Bagchi Mr. Arup Sarkar Ms. Sabnam Laskar ....for the petitioner Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated in view of a previous suit for partition pending between the private parties. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. Considering the injury of the victim and considering the fact that the previous partition suit pending between the private parties and considering the fact that the police filed chargesheet, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)