Abu Sayem Aktar @ Badal @ Badla And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

30.11.2021 Serial no.24 Aloke (Through Video Conference) Ct. No. 29 CRM 7475 of 2021 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 10.11.2021 in connection with Ratua Police Station Case No. 264 of 2020 dated 04.06.2020 under Sections 341/325/308/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Abu Sayem Aktar @ Badal @ Badla & Ors. ... ...Petitioners Mr. Parvej Anam, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala, Advocate Mr. Ashok Das, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report.

Considering the injury report, the statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the involvement of the petitioners and the gravity of the offences and the fact that police filed charge-sheet, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and with a further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on every date fixed for hearing.

The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM 7475 of 2021 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)