← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/7484/2021rejected

Rahul Das v. State Of West Bengal

2021-12-17Hon'Ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty,Hon'Ble Justice Sugato Majumdar2 pages

17.12.2021 Item no.292 Court No.32 Avijit Mitra C.R.M.7484 of 2021 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal;

And In Re : Rahul Das .... petitioner Mr. Ivan Roy, Mr. Debangshu Bandhu ....for the petitioner Mr. B.K. Roy, Ms. Kumkum Mitra ...... for the State Apprehending arrest in connection with Regent Park Police Station Case No.149 of 2021 dated 04.09.2021 under Sections 498A/313/406/34/506 of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 the present application is filed praying for anticipatory bail. Learned lawyer representing the petitioner, submitted that the present petitioner has been falsely implicated. It is counter-blast by the wife, namely, the de facto complainant for filing of matrimonial suit by the petitioner. All allegations are false. The de facto complainant is staying at matrimonial home with seven years old son. Since whole allegations are concocted, anticipatory bail is prayed for.

Per contra, learned lawyer for the State Mr. Roy, submitted that strong incriminating elements are there against the present petitioner in the case diary. There are specific

allegations of torture and abortion. The present petitioner has illicit relationship with other ladies as transpires from the case diary. It is further submitted that because of torture, the de facto complainant attempted to commit suicide. Accordingly, anticipatory bail is opposed.

We have heard rival submissions and perused the case diary. Investigation is still pending. We find strong incriminating elements and allegations against the present petitioner. Even medical report indicates that the de facto complainant attempted to commit suicide. On perusal of case diary and other materials we find strong incriminating elements and allegations against the petitioner at this stage. Therefore, in view of the nature of allegations and the fact that the investigation is still pending, the instant petition stands rejected.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. No.7484 of 2021 is dismissed.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Sugato Majumdar, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)