Sam Mahamad @ Sabdul Sk. v. State Of West Bengal
05.08.2022 Sl. No.8 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (NDPS) 893 of 2022 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 02.08.2022 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 1439 of 2021 dated 27.12.2021 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act and Section 27A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. (NDPS Case No.04 of 2022) And In Re: Sam Mahamad @ Sabdul Sk.
... ... Petitioner Mr. Amitabha Karmakar Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick ... ... for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Banerjee Mr. Anindya Sundar Chatterjee ... ... for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in custody for about 20 days. It is further submitted no narcotic substance was recovered from his possession. Co-accuseds have been granted prearrest bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
We have considered the materials on record. We find that no narcotic substance was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and his complicity has transpired from the statement of co-accused before a police officer which is inadmissible in evidence. Co-accuseds have been granted pre-arrest bail. Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion that the petitioner has been able to rebut the statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. In view of the aforesaid fact, we are of the opinion further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary.
Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely Sam Mahamad @ Sabdul Sk., be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under the NDPS Act, 1985, Malda subject to condition that the said petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever or commit similar offences in future.
In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court. The application for bail, thus, stands allowed. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)