← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3789/2022allowed

Rejaul Islam @ Riajul Islam v. State Of West Bengal

2022-08-11Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De1 pages

11.08.2022 Serial no.11 Aloke CRM (A) 3789 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Banshihari Police Station Case No. 12 of 2022 dated 12.01.2022 under Sections 498A/325/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of : Reajul Islam @ Riajul Islam ... ... Petitioner Mr. Sakhawat Khandakar, Advocate Mr. Nazar Choudhury, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Sudip Kumar, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet and considering the fact that all other co-accused excepting the husband and hid elder brother were enlarged on anticipatory bail by the jurisdictional Court and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. CRM (A) 3789 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)