Sudip Chakraborty And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

26.11.2021 Serial no.112 Aloke (Through Video Conference) Ct. No. 29 CRM 7612 of 2021 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 16.11.2021 in connection with Hogalberia Police Station Case No. 261 of 2021 dated 11.11.2021 under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of: Sudip Chakraborty & Anr. ... Petitioners Mr. Kaustav Bagchi, Advocate Mr. Amanul Islam, Advocate Mr. Sourav Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. Debayan Ghosh, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Advocate Mr. Sanjib Kr. Dan, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the husband is in detention.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents in the case diary.

Considering the materials in the case diary and the complicity of the petitioners in the incident, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and with a further condition that the petitioner no. 1 shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of the investigation and petitioner no. 2 shall cooperate with the investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the Court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM 7612 of 2021 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)