Sourabh Kumar Roy v. Chairman Paschimanchal Unnarayan Parshad & ORS

14.10.2020 Item No.10 Ct. No.10 CHC W.P.A.16464 of 2019 [W.P.16464 (W) of 2019] C.A.N.1 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) r Sourabh Kumar Roy Vs.

Chairman, Paschimanchal Unnayan Parshad & ors. Ms. H. Chakraborty, Ms. Neelina Chatterjee ...for the petitioner C.A.N.1 of 2020 is application for urgent consideration of the writ petition. The application is disposed of by taking up the writ petition for consideration.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, admitted receivable amounts are being withheld by the respondent authorities without any valid reason. She submits that petitioner made a representation prior to the filing of the writ petition as also subsequent to the filing of the writ petition. She submits that the authorities be directed to consider and decide the representation by passing a reasoned order after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

In view of such prayer being made on behalf of the petitioner, it would be appropriate to direct the respondent no.1 to consider and decide the representation dated July 16, 2018 of the petitioner in accordance with law. The respondent no.1 will afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

The respondent no.1 is at liberty to hear such other parties and consult such documents that he deems appropriate. He will pass a reasoned order which he will communicate to the parties forthwith thereafter. It is expected that, respondent no.1 completes the entire exercise within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. It is clarified that, the petitioner is at liberty to produce any document in support of his claim before the respondent no.1.

W.P.A.16464 of 2019 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)