Sentu Sk. And ORS v. The State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. 7642 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) (AD) 30.11.2021 Court No.29 (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Baishnabnagar P.S. Case No. 344 of 2021 dated 25/07/2021 under Sections 448/323/325/326/307/354/427/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 E.S. Act. And In the matter of: Sentu Sk. & Ors.

....petitioners.

Mr. Amitabha Karmakar Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Swapan Banerjee Mr. Anindya Sundar Chatterjee ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that some of the co-accused were granted bail by the jurisdictional Court and that the police submitted charge sheet. He submits that since the police submitted charge sheet, custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not required. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the contents in the case diary. He opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the fact that the police submitted charge sheet and considering the fact that some of the co-accused are on bail, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each to the

satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on the dates fixed for trial and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 7642 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)