Tarak Ganguly v. Union Of India And ORS.

WEDNESDAY COURT : MB-07 ITEM : AD-04 STAUTS : DNP ID : 266057 AR : NANDY

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 17981 OF 2022 TARAK GANGULY VS.

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

MR. SOUJANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, ADVOCATE ......for the Petitioner MR. KALYAN KUMAR CHAKRABORTY, ADVOCATE ......for the Union of India

1. Mr. Bandyopadhyay, learned Advocate representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the instant writ-petition.

2. A written instruction in this regard, as produced by Mr. Bandyopadhyay, is taken on record.

3. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner, WPA 17981 of 2022 is 'dismissed for non-prosecution'. (PARTHA SARATHI CHATTERJEE, J.)

P a g e | 2