Rajamul Hoque @ Tajamul Mohammad And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction 22-08-2023 Item no.328A Subrata Bhattacharyya CRM(A) No.3133 of 2023 Tajamul Hoque @ Tajamul Mohammad & Anr.

-vsThe State of West Bengal In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with Harishchandrapur P.S.

Case No.600 of (corresponding to GR Case No.1836 of 2023) dated June 26, 2023 under sections 109/305 IPC Mr. Soupal Chatterjee Mr. Abhijit Mondal Ms. Sucheta Banerjee ...for the petitioners Mr. Prasun Kumar Datta Mr. Nirupam Dhali ... for the State Mr. Ashok Das Mr. Rahul Chachan ...for the de facto complainant

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present petitioners are stated to be parents of the boy who is alleged to have married the deceased after love affair. After the marriage, there was some tension between them and it is alleged by some of the witnesses that the present petitioners were also not accepting the deceased.

3. Regard being had to the facts and submission, nature of allegation, nature of offence and substantial progress in investigation, it is directed that each of the petitioners shall be released on bail by the arresting officer in the event of their arrest in the aforesaid P.S. Case on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including the condition that:

(i) the petitioners are directed to appear before the IO once in a fortnight on the day and time fixed by the IO

for the purpose of investigation till submission of Final Form.

4.

Accordingly, the prayer for the anticipatory bail is allowed.

5.

Within 21 days from today petitioners are directed to appear before the IO along with a server copy or certified copy of this order.

6.

The application being CRM(A) No.3133 of 2023 is disposed of.

7.

The arresting officer is hereby directed to act upon the server copy or certified copy of this order.

[Chitta Ranjan Dash, J] [Partha Sarathi Sen, J]