Calcutta High CourtCPAN/1836/2000dismissed for default

Husna Banu @ Hasnu Banu v. Nirmal Mahato

2022-09-21Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

21-09-2022 Item no.19 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.1836 of 2000 Husna Banu alias Husnu Banu -vsNirmal Mahato arising out of WPA No.6337 of 1998 None ...for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 dated September 7, 2000, sought for punishment of the alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated May 12, 1999 passed by this court in WP No.6337(W) of 1998.

It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]