Calcutta High CourtWPA/16098/2007dismissed for default

Pabitra Construction & Co. v. Uco Bank & ORS

2021-08-12Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak1 pages

(Through Video Conference) S/L No.62 wt 63 wt 64 WPA 16098 of 2007 With IA No.:CAN 1 of 2007(Old No.: CAN 7489 of 2007) 12.08.2021 Ct-8 (AD) Pabitra Construction & CO.

vs.

UCO Bank & Ors.

With WPA 16100 of 2007 Kamal Koyal Vs.

UCO Bank & Ors.

With WPA 16102 of 2007 Amal Kumar Koyal Vs.

UCO Bank & Ors.

Mr. Dilip Kumar Kundu Mr. A. Basu ... for the UCO Bank.

Three writ petitions are taken up for consideration.

UCO bank is represented.

None appears for the petitioner in WPA 16098 of 2007.

None appears for the petitioners in other two writ petitions also.

Since none appears for the petitioners in the three writ petitions, all of them are dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Interim applications are also dismissed for default. (Debangsu Basak, J.)