Jardish Sk @ Jarjish Sk v. State Of West Bengal

11.08.2025 Item No.28 Ct. No. 446 PG C.R.M.(A) 2750 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 872 of 2024 dated 25.08.2024 under Sections 115(2)/ 140(2)/140(3)/303(2)/ 3(5) of the Bharatiya Naya Sanhita, pending before the Court of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malda. And In the matter of : Jardish Sk. @ Jarjish Sk.

...... petitioner Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee Mr. Manas Das Mr. Arindam Poali Mr. Arka Roy ....for the petitioner Mr. Partha Pratim Das Mr. Tapas Kumar Saha ....for the State

1. Heard the submissions of both the learned advocates for the parties.

2. Perused the case diary.

3. It transpires at the outset that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case and all other co-accused are presently on bail including the principal accused.

4. On careful perusal of the materials available in the case diary, more specifically the contents of the F.I.R. and the various statements made under section 180 of BNSS including the statement of the victim person recorded under section 183 BNSS and in absence of any overt act against the present petitioner, more so when the other co-

accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court finds there is no such incriminating material against the present petitioner for which custodial interrogation of the present petitioner is necessary.

5. In view of the above, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to fulfillment of conditions stipulated in Section 482(2) of BNSS.

6. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS and on further condition that the petitioner must appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed and not try to tamper with the evidence and in case of violation of any such provision, the prosecution will be at liberty to pray for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

7. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Chaitali Chatterjee (Das), J.)