← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/3880/2022allowed

Bapi Rajwar And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-08-12Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

12.08.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3880 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Purulia (Town) Police Station Case No. 57 of 2022 dated 25.03.2022 under Sections 341/323/326B/307/120B/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. And In Re : Bapi Rajwar & Anr.

...... petitioners Mr. Sutanu chakraborty Mr. Falguni Bandyopadhyay Ms. Riya Ballav ....for the petitioners Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Mr. Soumik Ganguly Ms. Baisakhi Chatterjee ....for the State The State did not oppose the claim for parity with the other co-accused, who was enlarged on anticipatory bail by the order dated August 1, 2022 passed in CRM(A) 3647 of 2022. In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once a fortnight

till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)