Priyabrata Ghosh And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. 7772 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) (AD) 30.11.2021 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nanoor P.S. Case No.

dated 26/07/2021 under Sections 341/324/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code (corresponding to G.R. Case No.832 of 2021).

And Court No.29 (Rejected) In the matter of: - Priyabrata Ghosh & Anr.

...petitioners.

Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dan Mr. Saryati Datta ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Binay Panda Mr. Subham Bhakat Ms. Puspita Saha ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were falsely implicated. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report and the statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the injured.

Considering the materials in the case diary, the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein and considering the injury report and the statement of the injured, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

C.R.M. 7772 of 2021 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)