Kamal Nayan Singh @ Golu v. State Of West Bengal

September 11, 2025 34 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (M) 1280 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Jagatballavpur Police Station Case No. 182 of 2022 dated 20/8/2022 under Sections 395/397/324/412/212/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act. And In Re :

Kamal Nayan Singh @ Golu ... petitioner.

Adv. Sk. Toslim Ali ... for the petitioner.

Adv. Avishek Sinha, Adv. Chandreyi Dutta, ... for the State.

The petitioner is in custody for about three years and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only 16 out of 27 witnesses have been examined. There is little progress in trial. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record.

The witnesses examined by the prosecution have implicated the petitioner. The petitioner has been identified in T.I. Parade. The offending weapon and looted booty have been recovered at the instance of the petitioner.

Considering the material on record and prima facie involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The application for bail is disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)