Saiful@Saiful Alam v. State Of West Bengal

26.08.2025 Sl. No.35 AMR Ct.No.655 CRA 419 of 2012 In the matter of : Saiful @ Saiful Alam .... Appellant Mr. Sabir Ahmed Ms. Tasnim Ahamed Mr. Dhiman Banerjee ...for the Appellant Ms. Faria Hossain ......For the State 1.

Appellant is represented by the learned advocate. 2.

Learned advocate for the State is present.

3.

In pursuance of the direction, a report is submitted by the Superintendent, Berhampore Central Correctional Home, which is handed over by the learned advocate for the State during course of hearing.

4.

It appears from the report submitted by the Superintendent, Berhampore Central Correctional Home that the appellant/convict has already been released on expiry of sentence after getting 388 days' remission on 15.11.2018. The report submitted by the Superintendent, Berhampore Central Correctional Home be kept with the record.

5.

As the appellant/convict has already served out the sentence as passed by the learned Trial Court in the impugned

judgment and order of conviction, the instant appeal be and the same becomes infructuous.

6.

Accordingly, the Appeal being CRA 419 of 2012 is hereby dismissed affirming the impugned judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court. 7.

Let a copy of this order along with TCR be sent down to the learned Trial Court immediately.

8.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon complying with all legal formalities. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)