Abhijit Chowdhury v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

WPA 18867 of 2021 27.10.

Ct. No. 07 Abhijit Chowdhury Vs.

The State of West Bengal and others.

Ab --------------- Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy.

... for the SSC.

Mr. Raja Saha, Mr. Sanjay Mukherjee.

... for the respondent no. 5.

1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner nor has any accommodation been sought for.

2. Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the West Bengal Central School Service Commission, has submitted a report and states that, with the passage of time, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. He has pointed out that the copy of the answer scripts and all other information sought by the petitioner have already been supplied to him.

3. The document as produced on behalf of the School Service Commission is taken on record.

4. In view of the submission made on behalf of the School Service Commission, no further interference is required in this writ petition.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of without, however, any order as to costs.

(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)