Dipayan Chakraborty & ANR v. State Of West Bengal & ANR

12.09.2024 SL. 38 Court No. 551 Sourav C.R.R. 2478 of 2012 In re: An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

And In the matter of: Dipayan Chakraborty & Anr.

... petitioners.

Mr. Ranjan Kali Mr. Suraj Bhattacharjee ... for the petitioners.

Mr. Soumya Ray Ms. Anwesha Saha Mr. Pramit Panda ... for the opposite party no. 2.

1.

The petitioners and the opposite party no. 2 are represented by their respective learned advocates.

2.

Attention of this Court is drawn to the order dated July 30, 2024 as passed by this Court whereby and whereunder the instant matter was placed before the Secretary, Mediation Committee, High Court at Calcutta for mediation between the parties. A settlement report is received from the Officerin-Charge of Mediation Centre, High Court at Calcutta on 09.09.2024.

3.

On perusal of the settlement report as submitted before this Court and after hearing the learned advocates for the contending parties, it reveals that the present revisionists had made payment of Rs. 40 lacs. to the opposite party no. 2 and their disputes regarding dishonour of cheques in connection with CR 77 of 2005, CR 315 of 2004, CR 316 of 2004, CR 76 of 2005 and CR 74 of 2005 have been settled and compounded.

4.

Such being the position all further proceedings in connection with CA 17 of 2011, CRR 2478 of 2012 (arising out of CR 315 of 2004), CA 14 of 2022, CR 316 of 2004 and CR 76 of 2005 are hereby compounded and accordingly, the conviction orders as passed against the present revisionists in connection with the aforementioned five cases stand hereby quashed and set aside.

5.

The present revisionists are thus discharged from their respective bail bonds and be set at liberty at once if not wanted in connection with the any other cases. 6.

Before parting with, liberty is given to either the revisionist no. 1, Dipayan Chakraborty or the revisionist no. 2, Ranjit Chakraborty to withdraw a sum of Rs. 3,47,657/- from the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri as deposited by them in connection with Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 2022. 7.

With the aforementioned observations, the instant revisional application being CRR 2478 of 2012 is disposed of. 8.

The learned Sessions Judge, Jalpaiguri is directed to act on the server copy of this order.

(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)