Sudip Patra v. State Of West Bengal

28.08.2025 Court No.28 Item No.68 tbsr rejected CRM (A) 2790 of 2025 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kharagpur (Local) P.S. Case No.584 of 2025 dated 27.06.2025 under Sections 85/115(2)/117(2)/109(1)/89/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of: Sudip Patra ....Petitioner.

Mr. Sananda Bhattacharya ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Bidyut Kr. Roy Ms. Trina Mitra .....for the State.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The other co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail. The incident happened ten years after marriage. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State strongly opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and refers to the injury report. She submits that there are statements of neighbours who are the eye-witnesses to the particular case of assault. The husband was seen to have thrown the wife to the ground and assaulting her. She refers to the injury report as well.

Considering the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the statements of independent witnesses and other witnesses and injury report, I do not consider this to be a fit case for grating anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)