Bikash Senapati And ORS v. Dilip Senapati

22.08.2023 Court No. 19 Item No.49 CP C.O. 2529 of 2023 Bikash Senapati & ors.

Vs.

Dilip Senapati Mr. Subhas Jana ...for the petitioners.

The petitioners pray for expeditious disposal of the Title Suit No. 69 of 2015, which is pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Second Court at Contai. It is submitted that two interlocutory applications are pending.

The prayer of the petitioners is innocuous.

Neither party stands to lose if a proceeding is disposed of expeditiously. In fact, such expeditious disposal shall enure to the benefit of the parties and hence, there is no requirement for service of prior notice upon the opposite party.

The revisional application is disposed of with a direction upon the learned court below to dispose of the interlocutory applications, within a period of three months from the next date fixed, upon granting adequate opportunity to the parties to contest the same and without granting any unnecessary adjournments. Thereafter, the suit shall proceed and be disposed of within one year.

This court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the pending applications as also the suit. The learned court shall proceed independently and in accordance with law.

A copy of the revisional application along with a server copy of this order be served upon the opposite party and/or the learned advocate contesting the matter on behalf of the opposite party in the learned court below, within a week.

The revisional application is accordingly disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Parties are to act on the server copy of this order.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)