Md. Arshad v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

22.12.2021 Serial no.70 Aloke (Through Video Conference) Ct. No. 29 CRM 7993 of 2021 In re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 25.11.2021 in connection with Entally Police Station Case No. 188 of 2021 dated 17.05.2021 under Sections 307/324/323/424/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(2)/27 of the Arms Act.

-AndIn the matter of : Md. Arshad ... ...Petitioner Mr. Pawan Kr. Gupta, Advocate Ms. Farnaz Nasim, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Saibal Bapuli, ld. APP Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioner seeks bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioners are in custody for over 210 days. The police filed charge-sheet and, therefore further detention of the petitioner is not required.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. Moreover, he relies upon the criminal antecedents of the petitioner.

Considering the materials in the case diary the gravity of the offence and the complicity of the petitioner and the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, we are unable to grant bail to the petitioner.

CRM 7993 of 2021 is rejected.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)