Calcutta High CourtCRR/2525/2012dismissed for non prosecution

Satish Kr Ojha v. Mampi Ojha Nee Kundu & ANR

2024-02-22Hon'Ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay2 pages

February 22, 2024 AD - 8 Ct. 33 SG CRR 2525 of 2012 In the matter of: Satish Kumar Ojha ... petitioner Mr. Indrajit Adhikari ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Abir Chakraborty Mr. Ayan Mondal ... for the opposite party No.1.

Learned advocates for the petitioner as well as the opposite party No.1 submit that they have filed vakalatnama in the department today.

The petitioner as well as the opposite party No.1 are present in Court. Their personal appearance are noted and dispensed with.

Learned advocate for the petitioner has filed a written instruction on behalf of the petitioner stating that the petitioner has obtained a decree of divorce on 20.12.2017 and is not willing to proceed with the present revisional application.

Let the written instruction be kept with the record. Under such circumstances, the present revisional application is dismissed for non-prosecution. ( Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J. )