← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/1335/2025rejected

Chattu Mondal @ Chotu Mondal @ Bijoy v. State Of West Bengal

2025-09-19Hon'Ble Justice Suvra Ghosh2 pages

September 19, 2025 14 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (M) 1335 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Tangra Police Station Case No. 249 of 2018 dated 31/12/2018 under Sections 307/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code And In Re :

Chattu Mondal @ Chotu Mondal @ Bijoy ... petitioner.

Adv. Md. Zeeshan Uddin, ... for the petitioner.

Adv. Sandip Chakraborty, Adv. Pallava Priyadarshee, ... for the State.

The petitioner is in custody for more than seven years and prays for bail primarily on the ground of delay in progress in trial. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that on most of the occasions, the said delay has been caused at the instance of the petitioner and the co-accused. On merits, the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with the co-accused whose bail prayers were rejected by this Court earlier. This Court is informed that the prosecution proposes to examine 16 more witnesses and shall conclude witness action within 7/8 months from the next date fixed for evidence before the learned trial Court.

Considering the material on record, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The application for bail is disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)