Tania Khatun @ Bibi v. State Of West Bengal

23.08.2022 Serial no.30 Aloke CRM (A) 4017 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 283 of 2022 dated 07.05.2022 under Sections 498A/324/325/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the DP Act. -AndIn the matter of : Tania Khatun @ Bibi ... ... Petitioner Mr. Rabiul Islam, Advocate Mr. Raju Mandal, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee, ld. APP Mr. Santanu Chatterjee, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the husband is still in custody. Other co-accused were granted anticipatory bail by this Court.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the materials in the case diary.

Considering the nature of allegations against the petitioner and considering the fact that the husband is still in custody, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. CRM (A) 4017 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)