← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (NDPS)/957/2022allowed

Dulal Mondal @ Mandal @ Dulal Rahaman v. State Of West Bengal

2022-09-21Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

21.09.2022 Sl. No.4 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (NDPS) 957 of 2022 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 17.08.2022 in connection with Hili Police Station Case No.142 of dated 14.07.2021 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A of the NDPS Act.

And In Re: Dulal Mondal @ Mandal @ Dulal Rahaman ... ... Petitioner Mr. Kaushik Chaudhury Ms. Busra Khatoon ... ... for the petitioner Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee .. ld. Add. Public Prosecutor Mr. Parthapratim Das Mr. Saryati Datta ... ... for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in custody for about 70 days. It is further submitted no narcotic substance was recovered from his possession.

Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record. We find that no narcotic substance was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and his complicity has transpired from the statement of co-accused before a police officer which is inadmissible in evidence. Under such circumstances, we are of the opinion that the petitioner has been able to rebut the statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. In view of the aforesaid fact and the period of detention suffered by the petitioner, we are of the opinion further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary.

Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely Dulal Mondal @ Mandal @ Dulal Rahaman, be released on bail upon furnishing bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under the NDPS Act-cum-Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Dakshin Dinajpur at Balurghat subject to condition that the said petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever or commit similar offences in future.

In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court. The application for bail, thus, stands allowed. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)