Subhankar Polley @ Subho v. State Of West Bengal

September 12, 2025 46 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (M) 1346 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Liluah Police Station Case No. 176 of 2024 dated 7/04/2024 under Sections 326/307/384/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(i)(a)/27 of the Arms Act.

And In Re :

Subhankar Polley @ Subho ... petitioner.

Adv. Sk. Toslim Ali ... for the petitioner.

Adv. Debasish Roy, Ld. PP, Adv. Manisha Sharma, Adv. S. Balial, ... for the State.

The petitioner is in custody for more than a year and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record.

The petitioner appears to be the principal assailant who shot the victim. The offending fire arm has been recovered at the instance of the petitioner. The bullet recovered from the place of occurrence has matched with the said fire arm. This Court is informed that the prosecution proposes to examine 15 witnesses and 3 witnesses are left to be examined.

Learned counsel for the State submits that witness action is expected to conclude by this month.

Considering the material on record and prima facie role of the petitioner in the alleged offence, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)