Md. Yasin Mallick v. Tapan Kr. Mondal

18.08.2022 Item No. 83 Ct. No.40 Sayandeep CPAN 2182 of 1998 Yasin Mallick Vs.

Tapan Kumar Mondal in WPA 443 of 1997 None appears on the behalf of the parties on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There will be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)