← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/2696/2024allowed

Pratik Sankha Ghosh And ORS v. The State Of West Bengal

2024-08-06Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Uday Kumar2 pages

06.08.2024 Court No.29 Item No. 76 Allowed ar CRM (A) 2696 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kanksa Police Station Case No. 230 of 2024 dated 11.07.2024 corresponding to G.R Case No. 1405 of 2024 under Sections 498A/323/506//34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act.

And In Re: Pratik Sankha Ghosh & Ors.

Petitioners Mr. Debasish Kar Ms. Jagori Mitra For the Petitioners Mr. Manoranjan Mahata For the State

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the de-facto complainant is living separately for 9 years and practically there is no relationship between the parties. It is submitted that the allegation of torture and the document of injury are false.

2. Learned counsel for the State in opposing the prayer for anticipatory bail has referred to the statement of the parents of the victim.

3. Considering the materials available in case diary, the nature and extent of complicity of the petitioners in the commission of the alleged offence and apparent discrepancy between the statement of the F.I.R and the statement of the father of the de-facto complainant, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary.

4. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners, namely, Pratik Sankha Ghosh, Prasanta Kumar Ghosh and Bina Ghosh shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two Signed By :

AMITAVA ROY High Court of Calcutta 7 th of August 2024 02:13:59 PM

sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also to comply with the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner nos. 1 and 2 shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week or as and when called for till the submission of the final report and the petitioner no. 3 shall cooperate with the investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Paschim Bardhaman, within two weeks from date in connection with G.R Case No. 1405 of 2024. In the event of non-compliance of any of the conditions, the anticipatory bail shall stand automatically cancelled without any further reference to this Court.

5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed and the same is accordingly disposed of.

6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Soumen Sen, J) (Uday Kumar, J) Signed By :

AMITAVA ROY High Court of Calcutta 7 th of August 2024 02:13:59 PM