Hajrat Belal @ Bellal Sk v. State Of West Bengal

September 15, 2025 27 ARDR (Rejected) CRM (M) 1363 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 745 of 2024 dated 16/7/2024 under Sections 329(3)/117(2)/110/105/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In Re :

Hajrat Belal @ Bellal Sk ... petitioner.

Adv. Asim Kumar Chakraborti, ... for the petitioner.

Adv. Debapriya Samanta, Adv. S. Palit, Adv. Akash Kumar Chakraborty, ...for the de facto complainant.

Adv. Baisali Basu, Adv. Sanjida Sultana, ... for the State.

The petitioner is in custody for about six months and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of 22 accused persons sixteen have been granted anticipatory bail, three have been granted bail and two of the accused are still absconding. Further detention of the petitioner is not required. Learned counsels for the State and the defacto complainant oppose the prayer.

I have considered the material on record.

The eye witnesses have named the petitioner as the principal assailant who assaulted the victim with a brick on his head resulting in his death. The postmortem report supports the prosecution case.

Considering the gravity of the offence and prima facie involvement of the petitioner therein, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)