Himadri Sekhar Ray v. Rakesh Kr. Batsa

27.06.2022.

C.P.A.N. 1994 of 1999 Himadri Sekhar Ray Vs.

Rakesh Kr. Batsa In WPA 9311 of 1999 Himadri Sekhar Ray Vs.

The State ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)